Skip to content

[core] Prune schema modules from workflow bundles - #3550

Merged
NathanColosimo merged 7 commits into
mainfrom
codex/replay-prune-runtime-graph
Aug 25, 2026
Merged

[core] Prune schema modules from workflow bundles#3550
NathanColosimo merged 7 commits into
mainfrom
codex/replay-prune-runtime-graph

Conversation

@NathanColosimo

@NathanColosimo NathanColosimo commented Aug 14, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Summary

  • move runtime-only event metadata and attribute validation onto schema-free @workflow/world subpaths
  • keep the public Zod schemas available to hosts without pulling them into the sandbox
  • intentionally remove the superseded root-level World validation and event lookup exports as a v5 breaking change
  • add regression coverage for both a minimal workflow and normal attribute, hook, and step APIs

Result

For the 97-step benchmark workflow:

  • VM bundle: 612,980 B → 26,831 B (-95.6%)
  • fresh-context evaluation p50: 10.536 ms → 0.121 ms (-98.9%)
  • Zod modules in the benchmark VM bundle: 77 → 0 (workflows that import Zod themselves still include it)

Review scope

Serialized formats are unchanged. Besides the dependency-boundary refactor, this tightens two edge cases: an unknown attribute deletion can no longer offset a newly added key, and prototype-like event type strings safely return no metadata. The @workflow/world changeset is marked major for the intentionally removed public exports; on the current prerelease branch this still produces the next v5 beta.

Validation

  • full workspace typecheck
  • builders, core, world, and world-vercel package builds/typechecks
  • 3,233 package tests across builders, core, world, and world-vercel
  • focused workflow-bundle boundary regression tests
  • Next/Turbopack and Vite production builds
  • clean Codex + Claude autoreview after addressing feedback

@changeset-bot

changeset-bot Bot commented Aug 14, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown

🦋 Changeset detected

Latest commit: 4834383

The changes in this PR will be included in the next version bump.

This PR includes changesets to release 20 packages
Name Type
@workflow/builders Patch
@workflow/core Patch
@workflow/world Major
@workflow/astro Patch
@workflow/cli Patch
@workflow/nest Patch
@workflow/next Patch
@workflow/nitro Patch
@workflow/rollup Patch
@workflow/sveltekit Patch
@workflow/vite Patch
@workflow/vitest Patch
@workflow/web-shared Patch
@workflow/web Patch
workflow Patch
@workflow/world-testing Patch
@workflow/world-local Patch
@workflow/world-postgres Patch
@workflow/world-vercel Patch
@workflow/nuxt Patch

Not sure what this means? Click here to learn what changesets are.

Click here if you're a maintainer who wants to add another changeset to this PR

@vercel

vercel Bot commented Aug 14, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

The latest updates on your projects. Learn more about Vercel for GitHub.

Project Deployment Actions Updated (UTC)
example-nextjs-workflow-turbopack Ready Ready Preview, v0 Aug 25, 2026 2:59am
example-nextjs-workflow-webpack Ready Ready Preview, v0 Aug 25, 2026 2:59am
example-workflow Ready Ready Preview, v0 Aug 25, 2026 2:59am
workbench-astro-workflow Ready Ready Preview, v0 Aug 25, 2026 2:59am
workbench-express-workflow Ready Ready Preview, v0 Aug 25, 2026 2:59am
workbench-fastify-workflow Ready Ready Preview, v0 Aug 25, 2026 2:59am
workbench-hono-workflow Ready Ready Preview, v0 Aug 25, 2026 2:59am
workbench-nestjs-workflow Ready Ready Preview, v0 Aug 25, 2026 2:59am
workbench-nitro-workflow Ready Ready Preview, v0 Aug 25, 2026 2:59am
workbench-nuxt-workflow Ready Ready Preview, v0 Aug 25, 2026 2:59am
workbench-python-workflow Ready Ready Preview, v0 Aug 25, 2026 2:59am
workbench-sveltekit-workflow Ready Ready Preview, v0 Aug 25, 2026 2:59am
workbench-tanstack-start-workflow Ready Ready Preview, v0 Aug 25, 2026 2:59am
workbench-vite-workflow Ready Ready Preview, v0 Aug 25, 2026 2:59am
workflow-docs Ready Ready Preview, v0 Aug 25, 2026 2:59am
workflow-swc-playground Ready Ready Preview, v0 Aug 25, 2026 2:59am
workflow-tarballs Ready Ready Preview, v0 Aug 25, 2026 2:59am
workflow-web Ready Ready Preview, v0 Aug 25, 2026 2:59am

@NathanColosimo
NathanColosimo force-pushed the codex/replay-prune-runtime-graph branch from 7f68db4 to 4a2cc23 Compare August 14, 2026 08:08
@github-actions

github-actions Bot commented Aug 14, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

🧪 E2E Test Results

Some tests failed

❌ Failed E2E Tests

▲ Vercel Production (8 failed)

python-node (8 failed):

  • promiseAllWorkflow | wrun_41M0VDN06C0GJF9R48YSG9WQ30 | 🔍 observability
  • sleepingWorkflow | wrun_41M0VDNNN70GXQ8MQGB8DFFBVP | 🔍 observability
  • parallelSleepWorkflow | wrun_41M0VDNQ4R0GTSQZ0NV78PS68F | 🔍 observability
  • nullByteWorkflow | wrun_41M0VDNXQD0GN74C8N2SH970J4 | 🔍 observability
  • cancelRun - cancelling a running workflow | wrun_41M0VDTG7Y0GKNVYEMFAZHAT66 | 🔍 observability
  • cancelRun via CLI - cancelling a running workflow | wrun_41M0VDTH470GR3A7GYZW28QRRT | 🔍 observability
  • sleepInLoopWorkflow - sleep inside loop with steps actually delays each iteration | wrun_41M0VDTWJP0GGDVNP9TXTDB25Y | 🔍 observability
  • resilient start: addTenWorkflow completes when run_created returns 500 | wrun_41M0VDVECE0GW8TM4DBWV2H88X | 🔍 observability

🌐 Cross-language Conformance (9 failed)

python (9 failed):

  • deploymentId: 'latest' is a no-op in non-Vercel worlds | wrun_01M0VDY8HAYKF5H611G7HRPJGV
  • promiseAllWorkflow | wrun_41M0VDN06C0GJF9R48YSG9WQ30
  • sleepingWorkflow | wrun_41M0VDNNN70GXQ8MQGB8DFFBVP
  • parallelSleepWorkflow | wrun_41M0VDNQ4R0GTSQZ0NV78PS68F
  • nullByteWorkflow | wrun_41M0VDNXQD0GN74C8N2SH970J4
  • cancelRun - cancelling a running workflow | wrun_41M0VDTG7Y0GKNVYEMFAZHAT66
  • cancelRun via CLI - cancelling a running workflow | wrun_41M0VDTH470GR3A7GYZW28QRRT
  • sleepInLoopWorkflow - sleep inside loop with steps actually delays each iteration | wrun_41M0VDTWJP0GGDVNP9TXTDB25Y
  • resilient start: addTenWorkflow completes when run_created returns 500 | wrun_41M0VDVECE0GW8TM4DBWV2H88X

⚠️ Flaky E2E Tests (passed on retry)

These tests failed at least once and passed on a retry. A recurring entry here is a real race worth investigating.

  • cancelRun via CLI - cancelling a running workflow (nextjs-turbopack)
  • hookGetConflictWorkflow - hook.getConflict() resolves with the conflicting run when token is already registered (express)

🛠 Infra Events (absorbed by the harness)

Platform anomalies the e2e harness detected and worked around (e.g. a run the queue never picked up, replaced by a fresh run). Clustered timestamps indicate a backend blip; a steady drip indicates a platform issue worth escalating.

34 infra events
  • cold-start-warmup · suite warmup (python) · at 02:59:19Z · abandoned wrun_41M0VDKMMW0GH51Y8JG5NNFA53 · (+7 more)
  • run-pickup-stall · sleepingWorkflow (python) · at 02:59:35Z · abandoned wrun_41M0VDQ9BQ0GQK2NWX2GHQEVNE
  • run-pickup-stall · parallelSleepWorkflow (python) · at 02:59:35Z · abandoned wrun_41M0VDQ9BR0GJ9VX6F75YE9E9Q
  • run-pickup-stall · nullByteWorkflow (python) · at 02:59:36Z · abandoned wrun_41M0VDQ9BV0GYFB5RFCSNMCKA8
  • run-pickup-stall · promiseAllWorkflow (python) · at 02:59:36Z · abandoned wrun_41M0VDQ9BH0GK9EQXW0CP2ZJCA
  • run-pickup-stall · cancelRun - cancelling a running workflow (python) · at 02:59:36Z · abandoned wrun_41M0VDQ9WK0GMVHTNXHTJD781E
  • run-pickup-stall · cancelRun - cancelling a running workflow (python) · at 03:00:09Z · abandoned wrun_41M0VDR9R80GNBR3X3RRSVHN07
  • run-pickup-stall · nullByteWorkflow (python) · at 03:00:36Z · abandoned wrun_41M0VDS4QY0GH9G06DD4CNPHN0
  • run-pickup-stall · promiseAllWorkflow (python) · at 03:00:36Z · abandoned wrun_41M0VDS50Q0GX4S6T0PQTXW632
  • run-pickup-stall · sleepingWorkflow (python) · at 03:00:36Z · abandoned wrun_41M0VDS50T0GSG4ZEE82KCJB3M
  • run-pickup-stall · parallelSleepWorkflow (python) · at 03:00:36Z · abandoned wrun_41M0VDS4WM0GM7PK0RSWPBVGA0
  • cold-start-warmup · suite warmup (tanstack-start) · at 03:00:41Z · abandoned wrun_01M0VDS3CBPAJR0ZH8W972WZZJ
  • run-pickup-stall · cancelRun via CLI - cancelling a running workflow (python) · at 03:01:27Z · abandoned wrun_41M0VDS9XE0GTMQHS9QWWG5A2J
  • cold-start-warmup · suite warmup (python) · at 03:01:53Z · abandoned wrun_01M0VDRA3CVH1MKDJEYP3V2BDW · (+7 more)
  • run-pickup-stall · deploymentId: 'latest' is a no-op in non-Vercel worlds (python) · at 03:02:08Z · abandoned wrun_01M0VDVZ8CVJ5HP9G5FB1A1M3F
  • run-pickup-stall · sleepingWorkflow (python) · at 03:02:08Z · abandoned wrun_01M0VDVZ8H5BFT2BTQGSX5M1FZ
  • run-pickup-stall · parallelSleepWorkflow (python) · at 03:02:08Z · abandoned wrun_01M0VDVZ8M8XKZTWA23C6T2N7A
  • run-pickup-stall · nullByteWorkflow (python) · at 03:02:08Z · abandoned wrun_01M0VDVZ8NTRCFXWR32772DDWJ
  • run-pickup-stall · promiseAllWorkflow (python) · at 03:02:08Z · abandoned wrun_01M0VDVZ8DP1T84GQYSC3FST3V
  • run-pickup-stall · workflow throws after awaited setAttributes: attribute still persists on the failed run (nuxt) · at 03:03:00Z · abandoned wrun_01M0VDXJ26475QRTXK3E4NYG5E
  • run-pickup-stall · deploymentId: 'latest' is a no-op in non-Vercel worlds (python) · at 03:03:08Z · abandoned wrun_01M0VDXSW1STJBAFKY2ZTCJK9G
  • run-pickup-stall · sleepingWorkflow (python) · at 03:03:08Z · abandoned wrun_01M0VDXSW5NENDADCH34B3A56A
  • run-pickup-stall · promiseAllWorkflow (python) · at 03:03:08Z · abandoned wrun_01M0VDXSW3FS334GPAR9QK29DK
  • run-pickup-stall · nullByteWorkflow (python) · at 03:03:08Z · abandoned wrun_01M0VDXSWE2XMMPSNBC595YAX9
  • run-pickup-stall · parallelSleepWorkflow (python) · at 03:03:08Z · abandoned wrun_01M0VDXSW8ATGQPPHSTAPYGT45
  • run-pickup-stall · cancelRun via CLI - cancelling a running workflow (python) · at 03:03:08Z · abandoned wrun_41M0VDW1SZ0GY2PX4NR4R4Y8X5
  • run-pickup-stall · sleepInLoopWorkflow - sleep inside loop with steps actually delays each iteration (python) · at 03:03:08Z · abandoned wrun_41M0VDVWMG0GJ7M15MXRX9SJEM
  • run-pickup-stall · cancelRun - cancelling a running workflow (python) · at 03:04:08Z · abandoned wrun_01M0VDZMFMRD0Y1PD7NBT2M72C
  • run-pickup-stall · cancelRun via CLI - cancelling a running workflow (python) · at 03:04:08Z · abandoned wrun_01M0VDZMFVFN8Q4FA149CMQ9EQ
  • run-pickup-stall · sleepInLoopWorkflow - sleep inside loop with steps actually delays each iteration (python) · at 03:04:08Z · abandoned wrun_01M0VDZMFZ1SM0TW62J5SAFBK3
  • run-pickup-stall · cancelRun via CLI - cancelling a running workflow (python) · at 03:04:38Z · abandoned wrun_01M0VE0HVJRVGZC5NAGY22430N
  • run-pickup-stall · cancelRun - cancelling a running workflow (python) · at 03:04:38Z · abandoned wrun_01M0VE0HVDHGJS57WFKR4Y7XDS
  • run-pickup-stall · sleepInLoopWorkflow - sleep inside loop with steps actually delays each iteration (python) · at 03:05:08Z · abandoned wrun_01M0VE1F35J38MPSCFZMN6YX2P
  • run-pickup-stall · WorkflowNotRegisteredError fails the run when workflow does not exist (nextjs-webpack) · at 03:05:16Z · abandoned wrun_01M0VE1QKFX8AWRVN1GKHDE0K9

E2E Test Summary

Summary
Passed Failed Skipped Total
❌ ▲ Vercel Production 3570 8 742 4320
✅ 💻 Local Development 3922 0 558 4480
✅ 📦 Local Production 3922 0 558 4480
✅ 🐘 Local Postgres 3922 0 558 4480
✅ 🪟 Windows 320 0 0 320
❌ 🌐 Cross-language Conformance 0 9 132 141
✅ vercel-http-transport 817 0 143 960
✅ vercel-multi-region 27 0 0 27
✅ vercel-ws-transport 553 0 87 640
Total 17053 17 2778 19848
Details by Category

❌ ▲ Vercel Production

App Passed Failed Skipped
✅ astro-node 132 0 28
✅ astro-quickjs 132 0 28
✅ example-node 132 0 28
✅ example-quickjs 132 0 28
✅ express-node 132 0 28
✅ express-quickjs 132 0 28
✅ fastify-node 132 0 28
✅ fastify-quickjs 132 0 28
✅ hono-node 132 0 28
✅ hono-quickjs 132 0 28
✅ nest-node 132 0 28
✅ nest-quickjs 132 0 28
✅ nextjs-turbopack-node 157 0 3
✅ nextjs-turbopack-quickjs 157 0 3
✅ nextjs-webpack-node 157 0 3
✅ nextjs-webpack-quickjs 157 0 3
✅ nitro-node 132 0 28
✅ nitro-quickjs 132 0 28
✅ nuxt-node 132 0 28
✅ nuxt-quickjs 132 0 28
❌ python-node 0 8 152
✅ sveltekit-node 151 0 9
✅ sveltekit-quickjs 151 0 9
✅ tanstack-start-node 132 0 28
✅ tanstack-start-quickjs 132 0 28
✅ vite-node 132 0 28
✅ vite-quickjs 132 0 28

✅ 💻 Local Development

App Passed Failed Skipped
✅ astro-stable-node 134 0 26
✅ astro-stable-quickjs 134 0 26
✅ express-stable-node 134 0 26
✅ express-stable-quickjs 134 0 26
✅ fastify-stable-node 134 0 26
✅ fastify-stable-quickjs 134 0 26
✅ hono-stable-node 134 0 26
✅ hono-stable-quickjs 134 0 26
✅ nest-stable-node 134 0 26
✅ nest-stable-quickjs 134 0 26
✅ nextjs-turbopack-canary-node 141 0 19
✅ nextjs-turbopack-canary-quickjs 141 0 19
✅ nextjs-turbopack-stable-node 160 0 0
✅ nextjs-turbopack-stable-quickjs 160 0 0
✅ nextjs-webpack-canary-node 141 0 19
✅ nextjs-webpack-canary-quickjs 141 0 19
✅ nextjs-webpack-stable-node 160 0 0
✅ nextjs-webpack-stable-quickjs 160 0 0
✅ nitro-stable-node 134 0 26
✅ nitro-stable-quickjs 134 0 26
✅ nuxt-stable-node 134 0 26
✅ nuxt-stable-quickjs 134 0 26
✅ sveltekit-stable-node 153 0 7
✅ sveltekit-stable-quickjs 153 0 7
✅ tanstack-start-node 134 0 26
✅ tanstack-start-quickjs 134 0 26
✅ vite-stable-node 134 0 26
✅ vite-stable-quickjs 134 0 26

✅ 📦 Local Production

App Passed Failed Skipped
✅ astro-stable-node 134 0 26
✅ astro-stable-quickjs 134 0 26
✅ express-stable-node 134 0 26
✅ express-stable-quickjs 134 0 26
✅ fastify-stable-node 134 0 26
✅ fastify-stable-quickjs 134 0 26
✅ hono-stable-node 134 0 26
✅ hono-stable-quickjs 134 0 26
✅ nest-stable-node 134 0 26
✅ nest-stable-quickjs 134 0 26
✅ nextjs-turbopack-canary-node 141 0 19
✅ nextjs-turbopack-canary-quickjs 141 0 19
✅ nextjs-turbopack-stable-node 160 0 0
✅ nextjs-turbopack-stable-quickjs 160 0 0
✅ nextjs-webpack-canary-node 141 0 19
✅ nextjs-webpack-canary-quickjs 141 0 19
✅ nextjs-webpack-stable-node 160 0 0
✅ nextjs-webpack-stable-quickjs 160 0 0
✅ nitro-stable-node 134 0 26
✅ nitro-stable-quickjs 134 0 26
✅ nuxt-stable-node 134 0 26
✅ nuxt-stable-quickjs 134 0 26
✅ sveltekit-stable-node 153 0 7
✅ sveltekit-stable-quickjs 153 0 7
✅ tanstack-start-node 134 0 26
✅ tanstack-start-quickjs 134 0 26
✅ vite-stable-node 134 0 26
✅ vite-stable-quickjs 134 0 26

✅ 🐘 Local Postgres

App Passed Failed Skipped
✅ astro-stable-node 134 0 26
✅ astro-stable-quickjs 134 0 26
✅ express-stable-node 134 0 26
✅ express-stable-quickjs 134 0 26
✅ fastify-stable-node 134 0 26
✅ fastify-stable-quickjs 134 0 26
✅ hono-stable-node 134 0 26
✅ hono-stable-quickjs 134 0 26
✅ nest-stable-node 134 0 26
✅ nest-stable-quickjs 134 0 26
✅ nextjs-turbopack-canary-node 141 0 19
✅ nextjs-turbopack-canary-quickjs 141 0 19
✅ nextjs-turbopack-stable-node 160 0 0
✅ nextjs-turbopack-stable-quickjs 160 0 0
✅ nextjs-webpack-canary-node 141 0 19
✅ nextjs-webpack-canary-quickjs 141 0 19
✅ nextjs-webpack-stable-node 160 0 0
✅ nextjs-webpack-stable-quickjs 160 0 0
✅ nitro-stable-node 134 0 26
✅ nitro-stable-quickjs 134 0 26
✅ nuxt-stable-node 134 0 26
✅ nuxt-stable-quickjs 134 0 26
✅ sveltekit-stable-node 153 0 7
✅ sveltekit-stable-quickjs 153 0 7
✅ tanstack-start-node 134 0 26
✅ tanstack-start-quickjs 134 0 26
✅ vite-stable-node 134 0 26
✅ vite-stable-quickjs 134 0 26

✅ 🪟 Windows

App Passed Failed Skipped
✅ nextjs-turbopack-node 160 0 0
✅ nextjs-turbopack-quickjs 160 0 0

❌ 🌐 Cross-language Conformance

App Passed Failed Skipped
❌ python 0 9 132

✅ vercel-http-transport

App Passed Failed Skipped
✅ example 132 0 28
✅ express 132 0 28
✅ hono 132 0 28
✅ nextjs-turbopack 157 0 3
✅ nitro 132 0 28
✅ vite 132 0 28

✅ vercel-multi-region

App Passed Failed Skipped
✅ nextjs-turbopack 27 0 0

✅ vercel-ws-transport

App Passed Failed Skipped
✅ example 132 0 28
✅ express 132 0 28
✅ nextjs-turbopack 157 0 3
✅ vite 132 0 28

📋 View full workflow run

@github-actions

github-actions Bot commented Aug 14, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

📊 Workflow Benchmarks

commit 4834383 · Tue, 25 Aug 2026 03:22:33 GMT · run logs

Backend: vercel · app: nextjs-turbopack

Metric Scenario Best (ms) P75 (ms) P90 (ms) P99 (ms) Samples
TTFS step 240 (-38%) 💚 1525 🔴 (+39%) 🔻 1574 🔴 (+39%) 🔻 1838 🔴 (+32%) 🔻 30
TTFS stream 485 (+177%) 🔻 1484 🔴 (+34%) 🔻 1516 🔴 (+34%) 🔻 1567 🔴 (+36%) 🔻 30
TTFS hook + stream 1712 (+199%) 🔻 1839 🔴 (+35%) 🔻 1897 🔴 (+20%) 🔻 1990 🔴 (-57%) 💚 30
Fan-out TTFS Promise.all(100 steps) 640 (+2.2%) 2135 (+95%) 🔻 2156 (+39%) 🔻 2292 (-54%) 💚 10
Fan-out TTLS Promise.all(100 steps) 2612 (+44%) 🔻 4012 (±0%) 4044 (-0.7%) 10348 (+3.9%) 10
STSO 1020 steps (inline) 100 (-11%) 156 (+9.1%) 175 (+5.4%) 281 (+17%) 🔻 1019
WO 1020 steps 157552 (+8.3%) 157552 (+8.3%) 157552 (+8.3%) 157552 (+8.3%) 1
CRTT first chunk (pooled) 125 (+51%) 🔻 198 (+41%) 🔻 246 (-5.4%) 458 (-35%) 💚 28

Streams

Scenario CRTT 1st p75 p90 p99 CDV max iters
paced control (100/s, 60B) 154 (+38%) 192 (+27%) 257 (-30%) 390 (-42%) 162 (+33%) 10
size sweep (100/s, 160B-12KB) 147 (+31%) 197 (+55%) 323 (+99%) 1023 (+56%) 228 (+111%) 10
replay gateway-gpt-5.4-nano-2000t (1x) 182 (+2%) 146 (-77%) 176 (-92%) 303 (-92%) 211 (-46%) 3
replay eve-gpt-5.6-sol-2000t (1x) 206 (+49%) 163 (+16%) 216 (+14%) 379 (-26%) 221 (-56%) 2
replay eve-gpt-5.6-sol-2000t (2x) 167 (+18%) 208 (+11%) 286 (+6%) 673 (-19%) 290 (+60%) 3
📈 STSO distribution vs main (inline / queue-hop histograms)

1020 steps (inline)

Cumulative STSO time: main 144386ms → this run 156134ms (Δ +11748ms, +8%)

100-150 ms  █████████████████┃██████  main 853  this 646  -207
150-200 ms  ████░░░░┃                 main 138  this 336  +198
200-250 ms  ┃                         main  19  this  22    +3
250-300 ms  ┃                         main   4  this   7    +3
300-350 ms  ┃                         main   5  this   3    -2
350-400 ms  ┃                         main   0  this   2    +2
400-450 ms  ┃                         main   0  this   2    +2
600-650 ms  ┃                         main   0  this   1    +1
📈 CRTT drill-down vs main (RTT distributions & profiles)
variant  RTT 1ms→5s+             avg         p50         p90          p99     n
control  ······▂█▂····  150.5 (+19%)  135 (+27%)  257 (-30%)   390 (-42%)  3000
sweep    ······▂█▂▁▁··  172.3 (+46%)  145 (+46%)  323 (+99%)  1023 (+56%)  3000
gw 1x    ······▃█▁····    129 (-56%)   125 (+2%)  176 (-92%)   303 (-92%)  5295
eve 1x   ······▃█▂····  138.3 (+14%)  125 (+23%)  216 (+14%)   379 (-26%)  5186
eve 2x   ······▁█▃▁···  171.6 (+16%)  156 (+16%)   286 (+6%)   673 (-19%)  7779

RTT over stream progress (avg per tenth of stream, bars scaled min→max):

control  █▇▄▃▂▃▃▁▁▁  130–189ms
sweep    ▃██▅▃▂▁▂▁▂  133–242ms
gw 1x    ▅▄▄█▄▃▂▂▃▁  120–144ms
eve 1x   ▆▂▁▃▁▁██▂▃  124–166ms
eve 2x   ▄▁▃▂▂▆▃▅▆█  145–207ms

RTT by chunk size (avg per log size bin, ~160B → ~12KB serialized, bars scaled min→max):

sweep  █▄▄▄▃▁▄  170–175ms

Delivery jitter over stream progress (avg positive CDV per tenth of stream, bars scaled min→max):

control  ▁▅▃█▄█▄▂▂▁  40–50ms
sweep    ▁▆▅▄▃▆▄▆▃█  48–65ms
gw 1x    ▄▆▃▁▅▂▅█▁▃  38–43ms
eve 1x   ▇▄▁▄▃▃▆▃▂█  23–32ms
eve 2x   █▇▁▂▆▅▄▁▃▆  24–33ms
ℹ️ Metric definitions & methodology

Streams: first-chunk RTT (the stream-open path, before any buffering/backpressure), CRTT percentiles, and worst delivery stall (CDV max). Cells are medians across iterations; per-run values in the artifacts. No 🔴/🟢 marks until targets attach.

The collapsed STSO distribution section above buckets every step gap, split inline (same warm process — pure framework overhead) vs queue-hop (fresh process — dispatch, reinit, replay). = main, = this run, = fill.

The collapsed CRTT drill-down: per-variant RTT histograms (fixed log bins, · = empty) and mean RTT/positive-CDV profile lines over stream progress and chunk size. Histograms, avgs, and profiles merge exactly across runs; p50–p99 are percentile-of-percentiles. Per-index rows live in the artifacts.

Best/P75/P90/P99 deltas compare against the most recent benchmark run on main at the time of this run. 🔻 flags a delta worse than +15%, 💚 one better than −15%.

Metrics — TTFS: time to first step body (in-deployment start() → first step body) · Fan-out TTFS: fan-out time to first step (in-deployment start() → first of the parallel step bodies to complete) · Fan-out TTLS: fan-out time to last step (in-deployment start() → last of the parallel step bodies to complete, i.e. when the Promise.all resolves) · STSO: step-to-step overhead (gap between consecutive step bodies) · WO: workflow overhead (whole-run time outside step bodies, in-deployment anchored) · CRTT: chunk round-trip time (per-chunk write → read latency, one clock domain: deployment → stream backend → same deployment) · CDV: chunk delay variation / delivery jitter (inter-arrival gap minus inter-write gap per seq-adjacent pair; skew-free; the row is each run's MAX positive value, so one stall moves it)

Scenarios — step: one trivial no-op step, no stream; no hooks, so the run stays in turbo mode (in-process fast path) · stream: one streaming step; no hooks, so the run stays in turbo mode (in-process fast path) · hook + stream: registers a hook before one step, which exits turbo mode (dispatch path) · 1020 steps: 1020 trivial sequential steps; STSO is measured between consecutive steps in the given step ranges, and WO is the whole-run overhead outside step bodies · Promise.all(100 steps): 100 trivial no-op steps started together in a single Promise.all; Fan-out TTFS is the first of them to complete and Fan-out TTLS the last, both from the in-deployment clientStart, so their gap is the spread the runtime adds across the fan-out · paced control (100/s, 60B): the control: 300 tiny (~60B) deltas metronome-paced at 100/s — zero workload structure, so it reads the transport floor and flush cadence, and disambiguates transport-wide vs workload-specific when a replay row moves · size sweep (100/s, 160B-12KB): same pacing as the control with deltas padded in rotation across seven log-spaced sizes (~160B–12KB) — rotation decouples size from stream position, so it isolates whether chunk size causes latency · replay gateway-gpt-5.4-nano-2000t (1x): raw provider SSE cadence captured at the AI gateway boundary (gpt-5.4-nano, the most popular gateway model; per-token deltas p50 208B = the modal production chunk size), replayed exactly as measured — the typical customer's workload; its CDV is the typical customer's real delivery jitter · replay eve-gpt-5.6-sol-2000t (1x): a captured eve turn (gpt-5.6-sol, the most-used demanding eve model; ~2000 output tokens = production p50 turn length) replayed exactly as measured — eve's envelope protocol re-ships the cumulative message so sizes ramp 142B→13KB; the demanding outlier tenant's reality · replay eve-gpt-5.6-sol-2000t (2x): the same eve capture at 2x — the headroom/stress row; real fast-tier models emit the same chunk sizes at proportionally higher rate, so time compression is a faithful speed model · first chunk (pooled): every run's seq-0 RTT pooled across all stream scenarios — the first chunk precedes any workload differentiation, so pooling samples one shared stream-open path with exact percentiles

Replay cadences (semantic sha256) — eve-gpt-5.6-sol-2000t eaf22f5946e7c61f3c65c7006d550df180cfabd4e706254a09f22aec0cfb420d · gateway-gpt-5.4-nano-2000t 6f24ac518b6b83ff1d0e85a5fe78230db192716d66a7fc6b2fe022752001d041

🔴 marks a percentile over its target (within target is left unmarked). Targets (p75/p90/p99, ms) — TTFS 200/300/600

All timestamps are deployment-side; runs are triggered in-deployment, so the CI runner and api.vercel.com sit outside every measured window. TTFS = start() → first step body (includes dispatch + any cold start); Fan-out TTFS/TTLS = first/last step completion of one Promise.all from the same anchor (the gap is the runtime’s fan-out spread); STSO/WO between step bodies; CRTT inside the workflow (excludes the api.vercel.com read path).

Cold starts stay in the numbers (real bursty-workload latency, inflates P75+); Best is the warm floor.

@NathanColosimo
NathanColosimo force-pushed the codex/replay-prune-runtime-graph branch from 8edf496 to 35bea10 Compare August 14, 2026 21:06

@VaguelySerious VaguelySerious left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

AI review: no blocking issues

Comment thread packages/builders/src/workflow-bundle-boundary.test.ts Outdated
Comment thread packages/world/src/index.ts
Comment thread packages/world/src/attributes-validation.ts
Comment thread packages/world/src/event-metadata.ts Outdated

@TooTallNate TooTallNate left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

AI: Approved. I found no blocking issues in the schema-free module split, validation changes, package exports, or bundle-boundary coverage.

@github-actions

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

No backport to stable for d62b444 (AI decision).

This is primarily a bundle-size/startup-performance refactor that moves World validation and event-metadata helpers onto new @workflow/world subpath exports and intentionally removes public root-level exports (validateAttributeKey, validateAttributeValue, EVENT_DATA_PAYLOAD_FIELD_BY_EVENT_TYPE, EVENT_DATA_REF_FIELDS) as a deliberate v5 breaking change, carrying a major changeset — exactly the kind of API-surface churn a maintenance line should not take. The two genuine hardening bits (an unknown attribute deletion no longer offsetting a newly added key in the per-run cap accounting in validateAttributeChanges, and prototype-like event type strings such as constructor returning no metadata) are small and could be split out and force-backported on their own if desired. Per the mixed-commit rule, the presence of a breaking refactor makes the whole commit ineligible.

To override, re-run the Backport to stable workflow manually via workflow_dispatch and paste this commit SHA into the ref input:

d62b44473b43e183e71386fe84b33f5e7bb5445c

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants