Skip to content

[core] Send the disposed hook's token from the QuickJS engine - #3773

Merged
VaguelySerious merged 2 commits into
mainfrom
peter/quickjs-hook-dispose-token
Aug 25, 2026
Merged

[core] Send the disposed hook's token from the QuickJS engine#3773
VaguelySerious merged 2 commits into
mainfrom
peter/quickjs-hook-dispose-token

Conversation

@VaguelySerious

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

The two engines disagree about what a disposal says.

suspension-handler.ts (node:vm) has always sent the hook's token on hook_disposed:

const hookDisposedEvent: CreateEventRequest = {
  eventType: 'hook_disposed' as const,
  specVersion: SPEC_VERSION_CURRENT,
  correlationId: queueItem.correlationId,
  eventData: {
    token: queueItem.token,
  },
};

quickjs-entrypoint.ts sent no eventData at all — even though the pending operation already carries the token, and already uses it to order same-token hook operations so a dispose releases a token before a later hook's creation is validated against it.

Why it matters

A world may key a hook's token claim separately from the hook itself, in which case retiring a hook means releasing both, and it needs to know which token this disposal is for. Told nothing, such a world has to look the token up before it can act — and the same workflow then does measurably different work depending on which VM ran it. hook_disposed's eventData.token is optional in the schema, so neither engine is wrong on the wire; they are just inconsistent, which makes this the kind of thing that surfaces as a backend-shaped bug report rather than an engine one.

world-vercel is the case in hand: it uses the token to release the hook and its token claim together.

The change

One field, from the operation the VM already populates:

...(op.token === undefined ? {} : { eventData: { token: op.token } }),

Omitted rather than sent as undefined when the operation carries none. PendingHookDispose.token is optional, and an explicit undefined encodes differently across the JSON and CBOR wire formats — leaving the field off keeps this engine indistinguishable from a client too old to send one, which is a case a world already has to handle.

Tests

packages/core/src/runtime/quickjs-hook-dispose-token.test.ts drives the entrypoint over a single hook_dispose operation with the VM mocked, so what is under test is the request the entrypoint builds rather than the VM that produced the operation. Two cases: the token is carried, and eventData is absent entirely when the operation has none.

Verified the first case fails without the change:

× carries the disposed hook's token
AssertionError: expected undefined to deeply equal { token: 'order-42-approve' }

packages/core/src/runtime is green at 728 tests, and hookDisposeTestWorkflow already covers disposal end to end on the QuickJS lanes.

🤖 Generated with Claude Code

The two engines disagreed about what a disposal says. The node:vm engine has
always sent `eventData: { token }` on `hook_disposed`; the QuickJS engine sent
no `eventData` at all, even though the pending operation already carries the
token and already uses it to order same-token hook operations.

That matters to a world that keys a hook's token claim separately from the hook
itself, because releasing both means knowing which token this disposal is for.
Without it such a world has to look the token up before it can act, and the
same workflow does different work depending on which VM ran it — a difference
that surfaces as a backend-shaped bug rather than an engine one.

The field is omitted rather than sent as `undefined` when the operation carries
no token, since `PendingHookDispose.token` is optional and the two wire formats
disagree about how to encode an explicit `undefined`. A world reading it cannot
then tell this engine from a client too old to send one, which is a case it
already handles.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
@vercel

vercel Bot commented Aug 24, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

The latest updates on your projects. Learn more about Vercel for GitHub.

Project Deployment Actions Updated (UTC)
example-nextjs-workflow-turbopack Ready Ready Preview, v0 Aug 24, 2026 11:38pm
example-nextjs-workflow-webpack Ready Ready Preview, v0 Aug 24, 2026 11:38pm
example-workflow Ready Ready Preview, v0 Aug 24, 2026 11:38pm
workbench-astro-workflow Ready Ready Preview, v0 Aug 24, 2026 11:38pm
workbench-express-workflow Ready Ready Preview, v0 Aug 24, 2026 11:38pm
workbench-fastify-workflow Ready Ready Preview, v0 Aug 24, 2026 11:38pm
workbench-hono-workflow Ready Ready Preview, v0 Aug 24, 2026 11:38pm
workbench-nestjs-workflow Ready Ready Preview, v0 Aug 24, 2026 11:38pm
workbench-nitro-workflow Ready Ready Preview, v0 Aug 24, 2026 11:38pm
workbench-nuxt-workflow Ready Ready Preview, v0 Aug 24, 2026 11:38pm
workbench-python-workflow Ready Ready Preview, v0 Aug 24, 2026 11:38pm
workbench-sveltekit-workflow Ready Ready Preview, v0 Aug 24, 2026 11:38pm
workbench-tanstack-start-workflow Ready Ready Preview, v0 Aug 24, 2026 11:38pm
workbench-vite-workflow Ready Ready Preview, v0 Aug 24, 2026 11:38pm
workflow-docs Ready Ready Preview, v0 Aug 24, 2026 11:38pm
workflow-swc-playground Ready Ready Preview, v0 Aug 24, 2026 11:38pm
workflow-tarballs Ready Ready Preview, v0 Aug 24, 2026 11:38pm
workflow-web Ready Ready Preview, v0 Aug 24, 2026 11:38pm

@changeset-bot

changeset-bot Bot commented Aug 24, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown

🦋 Changeset detected

Latest commit: 3873b69

The changes in this PR will be included in the next version bump.

This PR includes changesets to release 16 packages
Name Type
@workflow/core Patch
@workflow/builders Patch
@workflow/cli Patch
@workflow/next Patch
@workflow/nitro Patch
@workflow/vitest Patch
@workflow/web-shared Patch
@workflow/web Patch
workflow Patch
@workflow/world-testing Patch
@workflow/astro Patch
@workflow/nest Patch
@workflow/rollup Patch
@workflow/sveltekit Patch
@workflow/vite Patch
@workflow/nuxt Patch

Not sure what this means? Click here to learn what changesets are.

Click here if you're a maintainer who wants to add another changeset to this PR

@github-actions

github-actions Bot commented Aug 24, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

📊 Workflow Benchmarks

commit 3873b69 · Mon, 24 Aug 2026 23:51:48 GMT · run logs

Backend: vercel · app: nextjs-turbopack

Metric Scenario Best (ms) P75 (ms) P90 (ms) P99 (ms) Samples
TTFS step 1261 (+27%) 🔻 1492 🔴 (+35%) 🔻 1507 🔴 (+31%) 🔻 1540 🔴 (+23%) 🔻 30
TTFS stream 461 (-35%) 💚 1502 🔴 (+37%) 🔻 1529 🔴 (+38%) 🔻 1647 🔴 (+28%) 🔻 30
TTFS hook + stream 1507 (+9.7%) 1749 🔴 (+19%) 🔻 1866 🔴 (+24%) 🔻 2278 🔴 (+43%) 🔻 30
Fan-out TTFS Promise.all(100 steps) 579 (-11%) 1991 (+17%) 🔻 2115 (+18%) 🔻 2215 (+14%) 10
Fan-out TTLS Promise.all(100 steps) 1789 (-7.4%) 3701 (+17%) 🔻 3718 (+13%) 8728 (+2.9%) 10
STSO 1020 steps (inline) 78 (-26%) 💚 137 (-7.4%) 160 (-4.8%) 234 (+7.3%) 1019
WO 1020 steps 138942 (-5.9%) 138942 (-5.9%) 138942 (-5.9%) 138942 (-5.9%) 1
CRTT first chunk (pooled) 91 (+3.4%) 147 (+19%) 🔻 237 (+23%) 🔻 592 (-4.5%) 28

Streams

Scenario CRTT 1st p75 p90 p99 CDV max iters
paced control (100/s, 60B) 118 (+5%) 118 (-9%) 193 (-9%) 535 (-30%) 102 (-29%) 10
size sweep (100/s, 160B-12KB) 107 (-5%) 166 (+17%) 264 (+41%) 829 (-26%) 192 (+40%) 10
replay gateway-gpt-5.4-nano-2000t (1x) 141 (+15%) 113 (-83%) 148 (-96%) 329 (-93%) 199 (-8%) 3
replay eve-gpt-5.6-sol-2000t (1x) 136 (+15%) 114 (-15%) 151 (-11%) 279 (-19%) 261 (±0%) 2
replay eve-gpt-5.6-sol-2000t (2x) 141 (+15%) 152 (-17%) 216 (-18%) 332 (-40%) 214 (-6%) 3
📈 STSO distribution vs main (inline / queue-hop histograms)

1020 steps (inline)

Cumulative STSO time: main 147417ms → this run 138798ms (Δ -8619ms, -6%)

 50-100 ms  ┃                         main   0  this   2    +2
100-150 ms  ██████████████████████░┃  main 785  this 871   +86
150-200 ms  ███┃██                    main 216  this 131   -85
200-250 ms  ┃                         main  14  this   9    -5
250-300 ms  ┃                         main   4  this   3    -1
300-350 ms  ┃                         main   0  this   2    +2
350-400 ms  ┃                         main   0  this   1    +1
📈 CRTT drill-down vs main (RTT distributions & profiles)
variant  RTT 1ms→5s+             avg         p50         p90         p99     n
control  ·····▁█▇▁▁···  106.3 (-11%)    97 (-8%)   193 (-9%)  535 (-30%)  3000
sweep    ······▆█▂▁···    142 (+15%)   109 (-1%)  264 (+41%)  829 (-26%)  3000
gw 1x    ·····▁█▆▁····    101 (-70%)    96 (-5%)  148 (-96%)  329 (-93%)  5295
eve 1x   ·····▁█▅▁····   99.9 (-10%)    91 (±0%)  151 (-11%)  279 (-19%)  5186
eve 2x   ·····▁▆█▂····  120.4 (-14%)  111 (-14%)  216 (-18%)  332 (-40%)  7779

RTT over stream progress (avg per tenth of stream, bars scaled min→max):

control  ▅▆▅▂▁▂▃█▃▄  95–123ms
sweep    ▆▇█▄▆▂▁▂▁▂  108–188ms
gw 1x    ▆▃▂█▄▃▂▂▂▁  90–125ms
eve 1x   ▄▃▄▅▁▂▇█▃▃  87–116ms
eve 2x   ▅▁▂▇▂▂▇█▆▅  103–137ms

RTT by chunk size (avg per log size bin, ~160B → ~12KB serialized, bars scaled min→max):

sweep  ▇█▅▂▄▂▁  140–145ms

Delivery jitter over stream progress (avg positive CDV per tenth of stream, bars scaled min→max):

control  ▁▆▄▃▃▁█▄▂▄  27–42ms
sweep    ▁█▅▃▆▄▄▄▄▂  35–80ms
gw 1x    █▄▂▇▄▄▄▆▁▄  26–32ms
eve 1x   ▂█▃▄▃▁▇▄▃█  18–25ms
eve 2x   ▇▅▁▇▅▄▅▂▆█  17–24ms
📜 Previous results (1)

f3d26ba

Mon, 24 Aug 2026 23:29:51 GMT · run logs

vercel / nextjs-turbopack

Metric Scenario Best (ms) P75 (ms) P90 (ms) P99 (ms) Samples
TTFS step 1272 (+28%) 🔻 1425 🔴 (+29%) 🔻 1445 🔴 (+25%) 🔻 1592 🔴 (+27%) 🔻 30
TTFS stream 325 (-54%) 💚 1421 🔴 (+30%) 🔻 1428 🔴 (+29%) 🔻 1511 🔴 (+17%) 🔻 30
TTFS hook + stream 708 (-48%) 💚 1658 🔴 (+13%) 1699 🔴 (+13%) 2065 🔴 (+29%) 🔻 30
Fan-out TTFS Promise.all(100 steps) 522 (-20%) 💚 863 (-50%) 💚 1953 (+9.2%) 2117 (+8.8%) 10
Fan-out TTLS Promise.all(100 steps) 1986 (+2.8%) 6162 (+94%) 🔻 9220 (+180%) 🔻 9272 (+9.4%) 10
STSO 1020 steps (inline) 90 (-14%) 123 (-17%) 💚 138 (-18%) 💚 210 (-3.7%) 1019
WO 1020 steps 123839 (-16%) 💚 123839 (-16%) 💚 123839 (-16%) 💚 123839 (-16%) 💚 1
CRTT first chunk (pooled) 85 (-3.4%) 162 (+31%) 🔻 684 (+254%) 🔻 4127 (+566%) 🔻 28

Streams

Scenario CRTT 1st p75 p90 p99 CDV max iters
paced control (100/s, 60B) 117 (+4%) 125 (-4%) 182 (-14%) 305 (-60%) 92 (-36%) 10
size sweep (100/s, 160B-12KB) 117 (+4%) 138 (-3%) 472 (+152%) 5220 (+364%) 155 (+13%) 10
replay gateway-gpt-5.4-nano-2000t (1x) 141 (+15%) 114 (-83%) 146 (-96%) 255 (-95%) 186 (-14%) 3
replay eve-gpt-5.6-sol-2000t (1x) 400 (+239%) 113 (-16%) 163 (-4%) 364 (+6%) 252 (-4%) 2
replay eve-gpt-5.6-sol-2000t (2x) 109 (-11%) 1375 (+651%) 2905 (+1005%) 3720 (+575%) 247 (+8%) 3
ℹ️ Metric definitions & methodology

Streams: first-chunk RTT (the stream-open path, before any buffering/backpressure), CRTT percentiles, and worst delivery stall (CDV max). Cells are medians across iterations; per-run values in the artifacts. No 🔴/🟢 marks until targets attach.

The collapsed STSO distribution section above buckets every step gap, split inline (same warm process — pure framework overhead) vs queue-hop (fresh process — dispatch, reinit, replay). = main, = this run, = fill.

The collapsed CRTT drill-down: per-variant RTT histograms (fixed log bins, · = empty) and mean RTT/positive-CDV profile lines over stream progress and chunk size. Histograms, avgs, and profiles merge exactly across runs; p50–p99 are percentile-of-percentiles. Per-index rows live in the artifacts.

Best/P75/P90/P99 deltas compare against the most recent benchmark run on main at the time of this run. 🔻 flags a delta worse than +15%, 💚 one better than −15%.

Metrics — TTFS: time to first step body (in-deployment start() → first step body) · Fan-out TTFS: fan-out time to first step (in-deployment start() → first of the parallel step bodies to complete) · Fan-out TTLS: fan-out time to last step (in-deployment start() → last of the parallel step bodies to complete, i.e. when the Promise.all resolves) · STSO: step-to-step overhead (gap between consecutive step bodies) · WO: workflow overhead (whole-run time outside step bodies, in-deployment anchored) · CRTT: chunk round-trip time (per-chunk write → read latency, one clock domain: deployment → stream backend → same deployment) · CDV: chunk delay variation / delivery jitter (inter-arrival gap minus inter-write gap per seq-adjacent pair; skew-free; the row is each run's MAX positive value, so one stall moves it)

Scenarios — step: one trivial no-op step, no stream; no hooks, so the run stays in turbo mode (in-process fast path) · stream: one streaming step; no hooks, so the run stays in turbo mode (in-process fast path) · hook + stream: registers a hook before one step, which exits turbo mode (dispatch path) · 1020 steps: 1020 trivial sequential steps; STSO is measured between consecutive steps in the given step ranges, and WO is the whole-run overhead outside step bodies · Promise.all(100 steps): 100 trivial no-op steps started together in a single Promise.all; Fan-out TTFS is the first of them to complete and Fan-out TTLS the last, both from the in-deployment clientStart, so their gap is the spread the runtime adds across the fan-out · paced control (100/s, 60B): the control: 300 tiny (~60B) deltas metronome-paced at 100/s — zero workload structure, so it reads the transport floor and flush cadence, and disambiguates transport-wide vs workload-specific when a replay row moves · size sweep (100/s, 160B-12KB): same pacing as the control with deltas padded in rotation across seven log-spaced sizes (~160B–12KB) — rotation decouples size from stream position, so it isolates whether chunk size causes latency · replay gateway-gpt-5.4-nano-2000t (1x): raw provider SSE cadence captured at the AI gateway boundary (gpt-5.4-nano, the most popular gateway model; per-token deltas p50 208B = the modal production chunk size), replayed exactly as measured — the typical customer's workload; its CDV is the typical customer's real delivery jitter · replay eve-gpt-5.6-sol-2000t (1x): a captured eve turn (gpt-5.6-sol, the most-used demanding eve model; ~2000 output tokens = production p50 turn length) replayed exactly as measured — eve's envelope protocol re-ships the cumulative message so sizes ramp 142B→13KB; the demanding outlier tenant's reality · replay eve-gpt-5.6-sol-2000t (2x): the same eve capture at 2x — the headroom/stress row; real fast-tier models emit the same chunk sizes at proportionally higher rate, so time compression is a faithful speed model · first chunk (pooled): every run's seq-0 RTT pooled across all stream scenarios — the first chunk precedes any workload differentiation, so pooling samples one shared stream-open path with exact percentiles

Replay cadences (semantic sha256) — eve-gpt-5.6-sol-2000t eaf22f5946e7c61f3c65c7006d550df180cfabd4e706254a09f22aec0cfb420d · gateway-gpt-5.4-nano-2000t 6f24ac518b6b83ff1d0e85a5fe78230db192716d66a7fc6b2fe022752001d041

🔴 marks a percentile over its target (within target is left unmarked). Targets (p75/p90/p99, ms) — TTFS 200/300/600

All timestamps are deployment-side; runs are triggered in-deployment, so the CI runner and api.vercel.com sit outside every measured window. TTFS = start() → first step body (includes dispatch + any cold start); Fan-out TTFS/TTLS = first/last step completion of one Promise.all from the same anchor (the gap is the runtime’s fan-out spread); STSO/WO between step bodies; CRTT inside the workflow (excludes the api.vercel.com read path).

Cold starts stay in the numbers (real bursty-workload latency, inflates P75+); Best is the warm floor.

@github-actions

github-actions Bot commented Aug 24, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

🧪 E2E Test Results

Some tests failed

❌ Failed E2E Tests

▲ Vercel Production (8 failed)

python-node (8 failed):

  • promiseAllWorkflow | wrun_41M0V26RGQ0GYZWGMJ6ASX7VVF | 🔍 observability
  • sleepingWorkflow | wrun_41M0V27FNX0GSJ6WM8FB5C49FR | 🔍 observability
  • parallelSleepWorkflow | wrun_41M0V27H550GN307C8TV5KRCQS | 🔍 observability
  • nullByteWorkflow | wrun_41M0V27QQA0GYPFBE9X7S5XAE1 | 🔍 observability
  • cancelRun - cancelling a running workflow | wrun_41M0V2CJRH0GTP139S1ZWH40FT | 🔍 observability
  • cancelRun via CLI - cancelling a running workflow | wrun_41M0V2CNKA0GPFGVK7Y6SC4V53 | 🔍 observability
  • sleepInLoopWorkflow - sleep inside loop with steps actually delays each iteration | wrun_41M0V2CYA70GR2EVTGHRAKMT96 | 🔍 observability
  • resilient start: addTenWorkflow completes when run_created returns 500 | wrun_41M0V2DGW80GXKV8CDSJ5Q6KZ0 | 🔍 observability

🌐 Cross-language Conformance (9 failed)

python (9 failed):

  • deploymentId: 'latest' is a no-op in non-Vercel worlds | wrun_01M0V2K3WJEPP37AE5W5J4E91J
  • promiseAllWorkflow | wrun_41M0V26RGQ0GYZWGMJ6ASX7VVF
  • sleepingWorkflow | wrun_41M0V27FNX0GSJ6WM8FB5C49FR
  • parallelSleepWorkflow | wrun_41M0V27H550GN307C8TV5KRCQS
  • nullByteWorkflow | wrun_41M0V27QQA0GYPFBE9X7S5XAE1
  • cancelRun - cancelling a running workflow | wrun_41M0V2CJRH0GTP139S1ZWH40FT
  • cancelRun via CLI - cancelling a running workflow | wrun_41M0V2CNKA0GPFGVK7Y6SC4V53
  • sleepInLoopWorkflow - sleep inside loop with steps actually delays each iteration | wrun_41M0V2CYA70GR2EVTGHRAKMT96
  • resilient start: addTenWorkflow completes when run_created returns 500 | wrun_41M0V2DGW80GXKV8CDSJ5Q6KZ0

⚠️ Flaky E2E Tests (passed on retry)

These tests failed at least once and passed on a retry. A recurring entry here is a real race worth investigating.

  • abortDeterministicBranchWorkflow: if-check takes same path on first-run and replay (nextjs-turbopack)
  • addTenWorkflow (nextjs-webpack)
  • addTenWorkflow (nitro)
  • cancelRun via CLI - cancelling a running workflow (fastify)
  • deploymentId: 'latest' is a no-op in non-Vercel worlds (nitro)
  • deploymentId: 'latest' is a no-op in non-Vercel worlds (nuxt)
  • sleepInLoopWorkflow - sleep inside loop with steps actually delays each iteration (nest)
  • utf8StreamWorkflow (hono)
  • webhookWorkflow (nextjs-webpack)

🛠 Infra Events (absorbed by the harness)

Platform anomalies the e2e harness detected and worked around (e.g. a run the queue never picked up, replaced by a fresh run). Clustered timestamps indicate a backend blip; a steady drip indicates a platform issue worth escalating.

33 infra events
  • cold-start-warmup · suite warmup (python) · at 23:40:10Z · abandoned wrun_41M0V26ZST0GY2P6EJ9TAXDF2T · (+7 more)
  • run-pickup-stall · nullByteWorkflow (python) · at 23:40:26Z · abandoned wrun_41M0V2AMH00GN14PJQK04CZVDK
  • run-pickup-stall · promiseAllWorkflow (python) · at 23:40:26Z · abandoned wrun_41M0V2AMGQ0GPMQ0N7575Z5GZJ
  • run-pickup-stall · parallelSleepWorkflow (python) · at 23:40:26Z · abandoned wrun_41M0V2AMGX0GY27F9CJ90E4WAH
  • run-pickup-stall · sleepingWorkflow (python) · at 23:40:26Z · abandoned wrun_41M0V2AMGX0GY27F9CJ90E4WAG
  • run-pickup-stall · cancelRun - cancelling a running workflow (python) · at 23:40:27Z · abandoned wrun_41M0V2AMRM0GV0SMK4R40WVEH4
  • run-pickup-stall · cancelRun - cancelling a running workflow (python) · at 23:40:59Z · abandoned wrun_41M0V2BM7E0GWHQRBWPFDZ332S
  • run-pickup-stall · promiseAllWorkflow (python) · at 23:41:27Z · abandoned wrun_41M0V2CFP80GQKD1Q57AVR1D21
  • run-pickup-stall · parallelSleepWorkflow (python) · at 23:41:27Z · abandoned wrun_41M0V2CFRZ0GGG642B0HRMGHRW
  • run-pickup-stall · nullByteWorkflow (python) · at 23:41:27Z · abandoned wrun_41M0V2CFVJ0GKJPFBVX5T9WCPT
  • run-pickup-stall · sleepingWorkflow (python) · at 23:41:27Z · abandoned wrun_41M0V2CFZK0GRF3TTEMSAT9CT8
  • run-pickup-stall · cancelRun via CLI - cancelling a running workflow (python) · at 23:42:17Z · abandoned wrun_41M0V2CKN70GXKD3TDEX89QNJY
  • cold-start-warmup · suite warmup (tanstack-start) · at 23:42:32Z · abandoned wrun_01M0V2E4HXFQ86A9QRCY6KTVP1
  • cold-start-warmup · suite warmup (python) · at 23:43:33Z · abandoned wrun_01M0V2D5F3QFCK8MK0106TGE6B · (+7 more)
  • run-pickup-stall · deploymentId: 'latest' is a no-op in non-Vercel worlds (python) · at 23:43:48Z · abandoned wrun_01M0V2GTKPWDV69YGNHC684T9A
  • run-pickup-stall · parallelSleepWorkflow (python) · at 23:43:48Z · abandoned wrun_01M0V2GTKYNA82S50HNZWZZE7Q
  • run-pickup-stall · promiseAllWorkflow (python) · at 23:43:48Z · abandoned wrun_01M0V2GTKPWDV69YGNHC684T9B
  • run-pickup-stall · sleepingWorkflow (python) · at 23:43:48Z · abandoned wrun_01M0V2GTKWM1WHPR2G4VJB5HS7
  • run-pickup-stall · nullByteWorkflow (python) · at 23:43:48Z · abandoned wrun_01M0V2GTM0Z9VWC5Y6JSWMNZ00
  • run-pickup-stall · sleepInLoopWorkflow - sleep inside loop with steps actually delays each iteration (python) · at 23:44:38Z · abandoned wrun_41M0V2F7JT0GKYY29C3Y457115
  • run-pickup-stall · cancelRun via CLI - cancelling a running workflow (python) · at 23:44:38Z · abandoned wrun_41M0V2FBHR0GS4CW6PXGYBW4PW
  • run-pickup-stall · deploymentId: 'latest' is a no-op in non-Vercel worlds (python) · at 23:44:48Z · abandoned wrun_01M0V2JN7GYW7HRGG7AT00P889
  • run-pickup-stall · parallelSleepWorkflow (python) · at 23:44:48Z · abandoned wrun_01M0V2JN7NYSH02V126SH3GCS7
  • run-pickup-stall · sleepingWorkflow (python) · at 23:44:48Z · abandoned wrun_01M0V2JN7J79BBBW2WJ3HA8XG9
  • run-pickup-stall · promiseAllWorkflow (python) · at 23:44:48Z · abandoned wrun_01M0V2JN7KCB2HJ153EJ6DCD81
  • run-pickup-stall · nullByteWorkflow (python) · at 23:44:48Z · abandoned wrun_01M0V2JN7RP0PR3D22DWDWB319
  • run-pickup-stall · cancelRun via CLI - cancelling a running workflow (python) · at 23:45:48Z · abandoned wrun_01M0V2MFVABD7EEVPSE1FS9SM1
  • run-pickup-stall · sleepInLoopWorkflow - sleep inside loop with steps actually delays each iteration (python) · at 23:45:48Z · abandoned wrun_01M0V2MFVEYYGKH65Q5EBJTXD1
  • run-pickup-stall · cancelRun - cancelling a running workflow (python) · at 23:45:48Z · abandoned wrun_01M0V2MFV64C0MMQQ258PWDS08
  • run-pickup-stall · cancelRun via CLI - cancelling a running workflow (python) · at 23:46:18Z · abandoned wrun_01M0V2ND7601ZCCTNRANNFVNN7
  • run-pickup-stall · cancelRun - cancelling a running workflow (python) · at 23:46:18Z · abandoned wrun_01M0V2ND75V5DNFRQ32DP81JNT
  • run-pickup-stall · sleepInLoopWorkflow - sleep inside loop with steps actually delays each iteration (python) · at 23:46:48Z · abandoned wrun_01M0V2PAEHX874WWV099XZ5P3H
  • run-pickup-stall · hookCleanupTestWorkflow - hook token reuse after workflow completion (nextjs-webpack) · at 23:46:53Z · abandoned wrun_01M0V2PF95KM44HXJZ9EBWKS6R

E2E Test Summary

Summary
Passed Failed Skipped Total
❌ ▲ Vercel Production 3570 8 742 4320
✅ 💻 Local Development 3922 0 558 4480
✅ 📦 Local Production 3922 0 558 4480
✅ 🐘 Local Postgres 3922 0 558 4480
✅ 🪟 Windows 320 0 0 320
❌ 🌐 Cross-language Conformance 0 9 132 141
✅ vercel-http-transport 817 0 143 960
✅ vercel-multi-region 27 0 0 27
✅ vercel-ws-transport 553 0 87 640
Total 17053 17 2778 19848
Details by Category

❌ ▲ Vercel Production

App Passed Failed Skipped
✅ astro-node 132 0 28
✅ astro-quickjs 132 0 28
✅ example-node 132 0 28
✅ example-quickjs 132 0 28
✅ express-node 132 0 28
✅ express-quickjs 132 0 28
✅ fastify-node 132 0 28
✅ fastify-quickjs 132 0 28
✅ hono-node 132 0 28
✅ hono-quickjs 132 0 28
✅ nest-node 132 0 28
✅ nest-quickjs 132 0 28
✅ nextjs-turbopack-node 157 0 3
✅ nextjs-turbopack-quickjs 157 0 3
✅ nextjs-webpack-node 157 0 3
✅ nextjs-webpack-quickjs 157 0 3
✅ nitro-node 132 0 28
✅ nitro-quickjs 132 0 28
✅ nuxt-node 132 0 28
✅ nuxt-quickjs 132 0 28
❌ python-node 0 8 152
✅ sveltekit-node 151 0 9
✅ sveltekit-quickjs 151 0 9
✅ tanstack-start-node 132 0 28
✅ tanstack-start-quickjs 132 0 28
✅ vite-node 132 0 28
✅ vite-quickjs 132 0 28

✅ 💻 Local Development

App Passed Failed Skipped
✅ astro-stable-node 134 0 26
✅ astro-stable-quickjs 134 0 26
✅ express-stable-node 134 0 26
✅ express-stable-quickjs 134 0 26
✅ fastify-stable-node 134 0 26
✅ fastify-stable-quickjs 134 0 26
✅ hono-stable-node 134 0 26
✅ hono-stable-quickjs 134 0 26
✅ nest-stable-node 134 0 26
✅ nest-stable-quickjs 134 0 26
✅ nextjs-turbopack-canary-node 141 0 19
✅ nextjs-turbopack-canary-quickjs 141 0 19
✅ nextjs-turbopack-stable-node 160 0 0
✅ nextjs-turbopack-stable-quickjs 160 0 0
✅ nextjs-webpack-canary-node 141 0 19
✅ nextjs-webpack-canary-quickjs 141 0 19
✅ nextjs-webpack-stable-node 160 0 0
✅ nextjs-webpack-stable-quickjs 160 0 0
✅ nitro-stable-node 134 0 26
✅ nitro-stable-quickjs 134 0 26
✅ nuxt-stable-node 134 0 26
✅ nuxt-stable-quickjs 134 0 26
✅ sveltekit-stable-node 153 0 7
✅ sveltekit-stable-quickjs 153 0 7
✅ tanstack-start-node 134 0 26
✅ tanstack-start-quickjs 134 0 26
✅ vite-stable-node 134 0 26
✅ vite-stable-quickjs 134 0 26

✅ 📦 Local Production

App Passed Failed Skipped
✅ astro-stable-node 134 0 26
✅ astro-stable-quickjs 134 0 26
✅ express-stable-node 134 0 26
✅ express-stable-quickjs 134 0 26
✅ fastify-stable-node 134 0 26
✅ fastify-stable-quickjs 134 0 26
✅ hono-stable-node 134 0 26
✅ hono-stable-quickjs 134 0 26
✅ nest-stable-node 134 0 26
✅ nest-stable-quickjs 134 0 26
✅ nextjs-turbopack-canary-node 141 0 19
✅ nextjs-turbopack-canary-quickjs 141 0 19
✅ nextjs-turbopack-stable-node 160 0 0
✅ nextjs-turbopack-stable-quickjs 160 0 0
✅ nextjs-webpack-canary-node 141 0 19
✅ nextjs-webpack-canary-quickjs 141 0 19
✅ nextjs-webpack-stable-node 160 0 0
✅ nextjs-webpack-stable-quickjs 160 0 0
✅ nitro-stable-node 134 0 26
✅ nitro-stable-quickjs 134 0 26
✅ nuxt-stable-node 134 0 26
✅ nuxt-stable-quickjs 134 0 26
✅ sveltekit-stable-node 153 0 7
✅ sveltekit-stable-quickjs 153 0 7
✅ tanstack-start-node 134 0 26
✅ tanstack-start-quickjs 134 0 26
✅ vite-stable-node 134 0 26
✅ vite-stable-quickjs 134 0 26

✅ 🐘 Local Postgres

App Passed Failed Skipped
✅ astro-stable-node 134 0 26
✅ astro-stable-quickjs 134 0 26
✅ express-stable-node 134 0 26
✅ express-stable-quickjs 134 0 26
✅ fastify-stable-node 134 0 26
✅ fastify-stable-quickjs 134 0 26
✅ hono-stable-node 134 0 26
✅ hono-stable-quickjs 134 0 26
✅ nest-stable-node 134 0 26
✅ nest-stable-quickjs 134 0 26
✅ nextjs-turbopack-canary-node 141 0 19
✅ nextjs-turbopack-canary-quickjs 141 0 19
✅ nextjs-turbopack-stable-node 160 0 0
✅ nextjs-turbopack-stable-quickjs 160 0 0
✅ nextjs-webpack-canary-node 141 0 19
✅ nextjs-webpack-canary-quickjs 141 0 19
✅ nextjs-webpack-stable-node 160 0 0
✅ nextjs-webpack-stable-quickjs 160 0 0
✅ nitro-stable-node 134 0 26
✅ nitro-stable-quickjs 134 0 26
✅ nuxt-stable-node 134 0 26
✅ nuxt-stable-quickjs 134 0 26
✅ sveltekit-stable-node 153 0 7
✅ sveltekit-stable-quickjs 153 0 7
✅ tanstack-start-node 134 0 26
✅ tanstack-start-quickjs 134 0 26
✅ vite-stable-node 134 0 26
✅ vite-stable-quickjs 134 0 26

✅ 🪟 Windows

App Passed Failed Skipped
✅ nextjs-turbopack-node 160 0 0
✅ nextjs-turbopack-quickjs 160 0 0

❌ 🌐 Cross-language Conformance

App Passed Failed Skipped
❌ python 0 9 132

✅ vercel-http-transport

App Passed Failed Skipped
✅ example 132 0 28
✅ express 132 0 28
✅ hono 132 0 28
✅ nextjs-turbopack 157 0 3
✅ nitro 132 0 28
✅ vite 132 0 28

✅ vercel-multi-region

App Passed Failed Skipped
✅ nextjs-turbopack 27 0 0

✅ vercel-ws-transport

App Passed Failed Skipped
✅ example 132 0 28
✅ express 132 0 28
✅ nextjs-turbopack 157 0 3
✅ vite 132 0 28

📋 View full workflow run

@VaguelySerious
VaguelySerious marked this pull request as ready for review August 24, 2026 23:10
@VaguelySerious
VaguelySerious requested a review from a team as a code owner August 24, 2026 23:10
@github-actions

github-actions Bot commented Aug 24, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Sim World

Simulated world deterministic testing for races. Traces

🟠 world-sim scenario book — 1 fail of 41 total

fence=per-spec

scenario outcome events virt replay violations
smoke-no-steps completed 3 0ms ok 0
smoke-one-step completed 6 0ms ok 0
hook-at-step-started completed 12 0ms ok 0
hook-at-step-completed completed 12 0ms ok 0
hook-at-hook-created completed 12 0ms ok 0
deadline-hook-wins completed 7 1.0h ok 0
deadline-expires completed 7 1.0h ok 0
long-sleep completed 11 30.0d ok 0
hook-never-arrives stalled 3 0ms skipped 0
step-retries-twice completed 10 2.0s ok 0
parallel-steps completed 9 0ms ok 0
hook-on-execution-state completed 12 0ms ok 0
peek-hook-before-branch completed 12 0ms ok 0
peek-hook-after-branch completed 12 0ms ok 0
peek-hook-at-registration completed 12 0ms ok 0
race-hook-before-probe completed 12 0ms ok 0
race-hook-after-probe completed 12 0ms ok 0
race-duplicate-delivery completed 13 0ms ok 0
attr-hook-before-step completed 11 0ms ok 0
attr-hook-after-step completed 11 0ms ok 0
attr-from-step-body completed 13 0ms ok 0
fork-hook-after-timeout completed 14 1.0m ok 0
fork-hook-before-timeout completed 14 1.0m ok 0
count-hook-after-timeout completed 17 1.0m ok 0
count-hook-before-timeout completed 20 1.0m ok 0
stale-read-step-count-fork completed 20 1.0m ok 0
stale-read-equal-step-counts completed 14 1.0m ok 0
step-vs-step-fork completed 12 0ms ok 0
step-vs-step-fork-fenced completed 12 0ms ok 0
fence-catches-benign-direction completed 12 5ms ok 0
in-flight-before-decision completed 17 1.0m ok 0
in-flight-before-decision-counted completed 17 1.0m ok 0
in-flight-after-decision completed 19 2.0m ok 0
stale-read-step-count-fork-fenced completed 20 1.0m ok 0
fork-hook-wins completed 13 1.0m ok 0
fork-timeout-wins completed 13 1.0m ok 0
unclaimed-payload-under-fork completed 17 1.0m ok 0
claimed-payload-under-fork completed 17 1.0m ok 0
writers-independent-step-bodies completed 12 0ms ok 0
writers-scripted-tempo completed 12 0ms ok 0
cancel-mid-step cancelled 7 0ms skipped 0

Full trace: world-sim.txt

const disposals = await disposeWith({
type: 'hook_dispose',
correlationId: 'hook_01JCHOOK',
token: 'order-42-approve',

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

AI: This test injects a token directly into the pending operation, but the terminal system-hook cleanup path in quickjs-runtime.ts (the synthesized hook_dispose around lines 2621-2625) does not copy p.token. As a result, completing a workflow with a durable, unaborted AbortController hook still reaches this entrypoint without a token and emits no eventData, unlike node:vm. Please include token: p.token in that synthesized operation and cover that producer path. A shared cross-runtime conformance harness can remain a follow-up; fixing this focused regression does not require that refactor.

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Confirmed and fixed in 3873b69b23. You are right about the mechanism and about the parity: I fixed the consumer and missed a producer.

Two paths build a hook_dispose. disposeHook in the VM builds it from the hook’s own closure and has always carried the token. The completion drain synthesizes a fresh object for a durable system hook the workflow never aborted, and dropped it:

toDispose.push({
  type: "hook_dispose",
  correlationId: p.correlationId,
  token: p.token,          // <- added
  hasCreatedEvent: false,
});

And node:vm does send a token in that same case, which I checked rather than assumed: workflow.ts:91-99 marks the live system hook disposed at completion and hands the same queue item to handleSuspension, which reaches disposeHook(queueItem) and its eventData: { token: queueItem.token }. So the asymmetry was real and specific to this path.

Covered at the producer rather than by injecting an op, since injecting one is what let this through in the first place. The new test in quickjs-runtime.test.ts runs a workflow that creates an AbortController, replays it with the hook durably created and its step completed so the drain actually runs, and asserts the synthesized operation carries the hook’s token:

× carries the system hook token into the completion-drain disposal
AssertionError: expected undefined to be 'abrt_01JGFJJZ00NJ87CBWD49MG5PQC'

That is the failure on the previous commit; it passes on this one. packages/core/src/runtime is green at 729.

Agreed on the conformance harness being the right long-term answer and out of scope here. Worth noting what would have caught this cheaply in the meantime: the two engines share no test that asserts they emit the same event data for the same workflow, and both of my tests are per-engine. If you want, I can open a follow-up issue describing the harness shape rather than leaving it in a review thread.

@TooTallNate TooTallNate left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

AI: Request changes. The entrypoint now forwards a token when the pending operation contains one, but QuickJS terminal cleanup still synthesizes tokenless system-hook disposal operations, so parity with node:vm remains incomplete. The blocking producer-path issue is inline. A shared runtime conformance harness would be preferable long-term but is not required for this fix.

The entrypoint change covered the consumer and missed a producer. Two paths
reach it with a `hook_dispose` operation: `disposeHook` in the VM, which builds
the op from the hook's own closure and has always carried the token, and the
completion drain, which synthesizes a fresh object for a durable system hook
the workflow never aborted — and dropped it.

So finishing a workflow holding a live AbortController still emitted a
`hook_disposed` with no `eventData`, which is exactly the case node:vm sends a
token for: its drain marks the queue item disposed and hands the same item to
`handleSuspension`, token included.

Covered at the producer rather than by injecting an op: the new test runs a
workflow that creates an AbortController, replays it with the hook durably
created and its step done so the drain actually runs, and asserts the
synthesized operation carries the hook's token. It fails on the previous commit.

Reported in review on #3773.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
@VaguelySerious

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member Author

(AI) E2E Required Check triage: red on the python lanes, which are red on main.

The two failing jobs are E2E Vercel Prod Tests (python - node) (8 failures) and E2E Python Conformance (9), and the failing tests are promiseAllWorkflow, sleepingWorkflow, parallelSleepWorkflow, nullByteWorkflow, cancelRun, cancelRun via CLI, sleepInLoopWorkflow and resilient start — basic workflows, none involving hooks or AbortController.

Both lanes fail on main at the same step (Run E2E Tests) in each of its last three runs: 32553968829, 32546699992, 32545905106. My branch is not behind — its base is 3c0d60be90, which is main's current head — so this is not the stale-checkout failure these lanes usually have.

The diff is also the wrong shape to cause it. Five files, all additive, all QuickJS-engine or its tests:

 .changeset/quickjs-hook-dispose-token.md           |   5 +
 packages/core/src/runtime/quickjs-entrypoint.ts    |   7 ++
 .../src/runtime/quickjs-hook-dispose-token.test.ts | 110 ++++
 packages/core/src/runtime/quickjs-runtime.test.ts  |  80 ++++
 packages/core/src/runtime/quickjs-runtime.ts       |   6 ++

python - node runs the node:vm engine, which touches neither changed file.

Not re-running: a lane that fails identically on main will fail again. What is green and relevant: Unit Tests (ubuntu-latest), Unit Tests (windows-latest), and packages/core/src/runtime locally at 729 tests including the two new ones.

Two things I have NOT attributed and am not claiming are fine — flagging them so nobody assumes I checked:

  • world-sim reports 1 fail of 41, in-flight-before-decision-counted. It shows violations: 0 and replay: ok, and it was already failing on the first commit of this PR, before the producer fix. I have not compared it against main.
  • The benchmark comment shows TTFS regressions. That workflow is separately flaky and non-required, and I have not looked into whether these numbers mean anything.

@TooTallNate TooTallNate left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

AI: Approved. The terminal QuickJS system-hook producer now preserves p.token, and the new test exercises the actual completion-drain path that previously bypassed the entrypoint-only regression test. A shared node:vm/QuickJS conformance harness remains desirable as a non-blocking follow-up.

@VaguelySerious
VaguelySerious merged commit 27cab14 into main Aug 25, 2026
177 of 180 checks passed
@VaguelySerious
VaguelySerious deleted the peter/quickjs-hook-dispose-token branch August 25, 2026 14:49
@github-actions

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

No backport to stable for 27cab14 (AI decision).

The change is confined to the QuickJS engine (packages/core/src/runtime/quickjs-entrypoint.ts, quickjs-runtime.ts and their tests), and verification shows stable has no QuickJS runtime files at all — git ls-tree origin/stable -- packages/core/src/runtime/ matches nothing containing quickjs, while only the node:vm suspension-handler.ts (which already sends the token) exists there. There is nothing on stable for this fix to apply to, so backporting it would import a main-only engine rather than fix a maintenance-line defect.

To override, re-run the Backport to stable workflow manually via workflow_dispatch and paste this commit SHA into the ref input:

27cab14adcc6f748500fca19cf78feeb60a125e7

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants