Skip to content

misleading coverage reports #3347

Description

@d-v-b

codecov is flagging the changes in #3346 , which corrects a few typos, as having "0% coverage". Clearly there is something wrong with how codecov is calculating coverage. Is this something we can fix on our side?

Metadata

Metadata

Assignees

No one assigned

    Labels

    No labels
    No labels

    Type

    No type

    Projects

    No projects

      Milestone

      No milestone

      Relationships

      None yet

      Development

      No branches or pull requests

      Issue actions