Decide Whether #2068 Merges Over Unstated Copilot Coverage #2069

Question

Pull request #2068 (branch feature/auto-1882, handoff #2067, fixes #1882 on promotion) has a Copilot review on its head 57f326db with no findings, no threads, and 10 of 10 checks green, merge state CLEAN. pr_review.py wait reports COVERAGE_IS_UNSTATED: no statement of changed-file coverage describes this head, so no round is proven to have read the full diff, and the pr-review-conduct Merge Gate leaves a merge without stated coverage to the maintainer. Merge #2068 to develop as is, or request another review round first?

Options

1. Recommended: merge as is. Reason: no finding is open, all checks pass, and the change is a one-line jq -rn to jqr -n swap plus tests, with two local strict-review passes recorded. The parked work is squash-merged to develop, the lane closes out, and configure.sh's check_environments() Percent-Encoded Name Is a Plain jq -rn, Breaking the Branch-Policies URL on Windows #1882 closes on the next promotion.
2. Request another Copilot review and wait for one that states coverage. Reason: it may produce the coverage statement the gate reads. The parked work waits one more round, which may return the same unstated shape.

Belongs to

Handoff #2067 (track auto-1882), issue #1882. Blocks pull request #2068. No promotion pull request is blocked.