[ptr727]

Splits the over-length sentences in scripts/README.md without changing what they say.

prose_lint.py --check sentence-length: 303 hits before, 2 after. The two left are copies held in files other slices own: README line 64 ("On the operational model a promotion runs the rule...", copy in OPERATIONS.md, still long form) and README line 169 ("Layering is tighten-only...", copy in STANDUP.md, owned by slice D).

The splits were checked against the originals in six strict review rounds. Three sentences that review kept flagging with opposite readings (README lines 9, 50 and the --check paragraph) were restructured as the orchestrator ruled. prose_lint.py --diff origin/develop reports nothing.

Copies left for the comment sweep

These README sentences are split here. A near-verbatim copy in a code comment, docstring or test still holds the long form, for the next step to align:

• README 64 "A trailing comment is out of scope..." and README 108 "comment-case reads the first character...": tests/test_prose_lint.py
• README 151 "sha-pin resolves the pin..." and "Resolving also catches the neighboring case...": .github/actions/repo-gate/repo_gate.py
• README 268 "A branch is finished when...": scripts/pr_cleanup.py
• README 288, 294 (--repo, --track, the fork exception, the in-process refusal): scripts/handoff.py
• README 315 (two sentences), 317, 321, 323: scripts/local_review.py (321 also tests/test_local_review.py)
• README 340, 354 (lock): scripts/canonical_review.py
• README 364 (skill and region): scripts/build_dist.py
• README 387, 389: scripts/carry.py

Copies in AGENTS.md, .github/copilot-instructions.md and the Skills already read zero, and this README follows their wording where they carry the same sentence.

Part of #3531

🤖 Generated with Claude Code

[Copilot]

Copilot wasn't able to review any files in this pull request. Check if the Files changed in this pull request are included in default exclusions.

[coderabbitai]

Important

• 🔍 Trigger review

This repository does not receive automatic reviews because it has fewer than 10 stars.

Run configuration

• Source mode: Auto
• Repository: ptr727/ProjectTemplate
• Branch: feature/3531-md-scripts-readme
• File: .coderabbit.yaml
• Commit: 16e206b
• Layers: Repository YAML
• Review profile: CHILL
• Plan: Advanced
• Run ID: 1b4f716b-def7-4d0e-98ed-0586e7e52abf

• Autofix · Keep fixing CodeRabbit findings and required CI, and resolving merge conflicts

Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out.

❤️ Share

• X
• Mastodon
• Reddit
• LinkedIn

_{Comment @coderabbitai help to get the list of available commands.}

[ptr727]

A recorded local strict-review pass covers head 6b610a1b459e0ffd32c09e678d52cddb8e9cb5c4, the content this pull request carries at that commit against develop, and it recorded 3 findings.

[codecov]

Codecov Report

✅ All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests.
✅ Project coverage is 81.60%. Comparing base (7364e14) to head (16e206b).

Additional details and impacted files

@@           Coverage Diff            @@
##           develop    #3594   +/-   ##
========================================
  Coverage    81.60%   81.60%           
========================================
  Files           26       26           
  Lines         9070     9070           
========================================
  Hits          7402     7402           
  Misses        1668     1668           

Flag	Coverage Δ
python-3.13	81.60% <ø> (ø)

Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more.

☔ View full report in Codecov by Harness.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

🚀 New features to boost your workflow:

• ❄️ Test Analytics: Detect flaky tests, report on failures, and find test suite problems.

[ptr727]

A recorded local strict-review pass covers head 16e206bec2ae2aef7fc62470d1d4bc5704f8e248, the content this pull request carries at that commit against develop, and it recorded 4 findings.