Repository navigation
Say the Hub Commits the Audit Report Wherever Done-Means-Audited Is Stated - #2408
Merged
Merged
Conversation
…tated Reword the passages that named the audited repository as the holder of its committed reports/<repo>/audit.md, so each says the report is committed in the hub, matching AUDIT.md section 8. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5.5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
Use "hub-committed" so each reworded sentence is no longer than the one it replaced, and split the rewritten TODO.md bullet in two. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5.5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
|
Warning Review limit reachedYou've used all free OSS reviews for now. Wait for the free limit to reset to keep reviewing this public repository. Next included review available in 33 minutes. View limit detailsLimit details: You’ve used the included review currently available. Review configuration: ⚙️ Run configuration
⛔ Files ignored due to path filters (3)
📒 Files selected for processing (7)
Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out. Comment |
Contributor
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Copilot review overview
🟢 Approval recommended
The documentation-only changes are reviewed; remaining comments are minor grammar nits.
Review effort: Lite
Findings: None
What changed in this PR
Clarifies that audit reports are committed by the hub and synchronizes generated skill copies.
Changes:
- Updated audit ownership wording across documentation.
- Clarified pilot evidence references.
- Regenerated skill distributions and source digest.
| File | Summary |
|---|---|
| TODO.md | Clarifies pilot report ownership. |
| STANDUP.md | Names the hub as report owner. |
| README.md | Updates onboarding wording. |
| GOVERNANCE.md | Updates completion criteria. |
| docs/reusable-workflows.md | Clarifies pilot evidence ownership. |
| AUDIT.md | Clarifies report ownership. |
| .github/skills/standup-a-repo/SKILL.md | Regenerated skill copy. |
| .claude-plugin/fleet-skills/skills/standup-a-repo/SKILL.md | Regenerated skill copy. |
| .claude-plugin/fleet-skills/.source-digests/standup-a-repo | Updates source digest. |
| .agents/skills/standup-a-repo/SKILL.md | Updates canonical skill wording. |
💡 Add a code-review agent skill or configure MCP servers for context-aware, tailored reviews. Learn more in the docs.
Owner
Author
|
@coderabbitai review |
|
This was referenced Oct 5, 2026
Promote develop to main: details Markup Pairing, Handoff Read Path, and STANDUP Deploy Sources
#2411
Merged
ptr727
added a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Oct 5, 2026
…cording Them (#2413) ## Summary - CodeRabbit found on promotion PR #2411 that `TODO.md` and `docs/reusable-workflows.md` said "the hub's audit report on the pilot records" what the hub cannot prove about the merge-bot task. `reports/photocleaner/audit.md` records none of it. That wording came from #2408. - Of the four things the hub cannot prove, only two are tracked: the pin's cross-repository resolution and its first Dependabot bump, each a Stage 1 proof item. The `rules` input and `merge-app` have no tracker item, and PhotoCleaner, the pilot, can produce neither. #2412 now tracks those two. - Each statement now says which two are proof items and points at #2412 for the rest. Stage 1's pilot sentence no longer gives the pilot a three-item list. "What a Pilot Proves" gives the four to downstream adopters rather than the first one. ## Verification - The prose gate on the diff, the `eol` gate, and markdownlint are clean. The two remaining `--check sentence-length` hits are sentences this change leaves unchanged. - `local-strict-review` ran twice. The first pass found the first rewrite assigned the `rules` and `merge-app` proofs to a pilot that cannot produce them. The second pass found nothing, and its receipt is recorded at the pushed head. 🤖 Generated with [Claude Code](https://claude.com/claude-code) <!-- This is an auto-generated comment: release notes by coderabbit.ai --> ## Summary by CodeRabbit * **Documentation** * Clarified which behaviors the merge-bot pilot does not verify and which downstream adopters need to validate, including cross-repository pin resolution, the first Dependabot bump, end-to-end `rules` use, and `merge-app`. * Updated the adoption notes and added a reference to issue `#2412`. <!-- end of auto-generated comment: release notes by coderabbit.ai --> --------- Co-authored-by: Claude Opus 5.5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
ptr727
added a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Oct 5, 2026
…nd STANDUP Deploy Sources (#2411) ## Summary Promotes `develop` to `main` with sixteen pull requests, each already reviewed and merged into `develop`: - [#2368](#2368) Drop the Path Argument From the VS Code Tasks Snippet's Mypy Swaps. - [#2369](#2369) Match Wildcard and Shortened Rows in Copilot's File Table. - [#2372](#2372) Emit an Unclosed details Block's Preceding Text Once in details_spans. - [#2379](#2379) Exclude an Issue Only on a Fix-Intent Reference in the Unattended Picker. - [#2381](#2381) Refuse a Backslash Anywhere in carry.py's relative_root. - [#2383](#2383) Pair Nonstandard details Markup Correctly When Blanking the Overview Narrative. - [#2389](#2389) Drop Blog's Stale lineEndings driftNote From the Registry. - [#2391](#2391) State the Archive Registration in host-setup.md's Fleet Skills Install. - [#2393](#2393) Verify the Resolved Head on handoff.py's Read Path. - [#2397](#2397) Read the Closed Handoff List Once for a Closed Head. - [#2400](#2400) Bound DETAILS_TAG's Opener Tail at the Next Tag. - [#2404](#2404) Remove the Resolved Financial-Modeling markdownlint Entry From the Divergence Ledger. - [#2406](#2406) Format Only a Scalar Step Name or Shell in the Composite-Actions Check. - [#2408](#2408) Say the Hub Commits the Audit Report Wherever Done-Means-Audited Is Stated. - [#2409](#2409) Name the Three Sources in STANDUP.md's Deploy Prerequisite. - [#2413](#2413) Say Which Merge-Bot Proofs Are Tracked Rather Than an Audit Report Recording Them, the fix for this PR's CodeRabbit finding on `TODO.md`. ## Review Coverage CodeRabbit reviewed this PR at `73c9031c`. The one commit since, `92b0fb3d` from #2413, has parent `73c9031c` and the same tree as `0b371236`, the head CodeRabbit reviewed on #2413 with no actionable comments (`git rev-parse <commit>^{tree}` gives `83bd3d9f` for both). So CodeRabbit has read every line this PR carries. Closes #2157 Closes #2167 Closes #2186 Closes #2351 Closes #2246 Closes #2187 Closes #2279 Closes #2236 Closes #1500 Closes #2394 Closes #2386 Closes #1573 Closes #2357 Closes #1826 Closes #2270 🤖 Generated with [Claude Code](https://claude.com/claude-code)
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Summary
AUDIT.mdsection 0,GOVERNANCE.md"Repository Onboarding and Conformance",STANDUP.mdsection 5, thestandup-a-reposkill, andREADME.mdsaid an onboarded repo "carries" its committedreports/<repo>/audit.md. Each now says the report is hub-committed, matchingAUDIT.mdsection 8 and the Fleet Bootstrap.TODO.mdanddocs/reusable-workflows.mdsaid a pilot records what the hub cannot prove "in its own audit report". Both now name the hub's audit report on the pilot.scripts/build_dist.py.Verification
git grepforcarries a committed,its own audit report, andcarries a committed reportreturns nothing.build_dist.py --check,spec/validate.py, and the repo gate pass. Every reworded sentence is no longer than the one it replaced underprose_lint.py --check sentence-length.local-strict-reviewpass is recorded at the pushed head, with no findings.Closes on promotion: #1826
🤖 Generated with Claude Code